The passage may be referring to a nocturnal emission, or wet dream, rather than masturbation, but the passage is not specific. By bringing up intercourse separately, the passage surely does imply that the emission of semen in verses 16 and 17 occurred for the man individually. Verse 18 goes on to say that if a man and woman have intercourse, the same cleanliness rules apply. Verses 16 and 17 say that a man who has an emission of semen should wash and be ceremonially unclean until evening. Johnson's biblical view on masturbation: "treating a solitary sexual experience, whether wet dream or masturbation, as a purely ceremonial cleanliness issue and not as a matter of morality." They state: "Johnson suggests that Leviticus 15:16-18 should set the tone for our dealing with masturbation. Rashkow states: "it is questionable whether masturbation is considered a category of 'negative' sexual activity in the Hebrew Bible" and that Leviticus 15:16 "refer to the emission rather than its circumstances." Jones and Jones state James R. Īccording to James Nelson, there are three interpretive examinations why Onan's act is condemned: the Onan story reflects firm "procreative" accent of the Hebrew interpretation regarding sexuality, a constant of the "prescientific mind" to consider that the child is contained in the sperm the same way a plant is contained in its seed, and masturbation as well as homosexual acts by men have been condemned more strongly than same acts by women in the Judeo-Christian tradition. There is no explicit claim in the Bible that masturbation is sinful. The biblical story of Onan (Genesis 38) is traditionally linked to referring to masturbation and condemnation thereof, but the sexual act described by this story is coitus interruptus, not masturbation.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |